The argument that the State Governor doesn't necessarily has to read the from the same text handed over to him is acceptable if and only the altered or corrected speech has been handed over to the Chief Minister ahead of the speech for atleast one day before the speech i.e. on 9th Jan. However, the Honourable Governor didn't have an obligation to do so, but the Honourable Governor could have foreseen the outcome of in these circumstance and did so in the interest of the people and duly respecting the August House. In the case for the sake of argument only words were omitted and not complete or whole sentences. As per my argument the Honourable Governor could have divulged from the convention and done duly respecting the House and the people of the state. The Honourable Governor by foresight has missed to see, which although might not be a big blunder or mistake, but definitely has missed on one thing for very certain. The Honourable Governor has missed to set an eve...