With the leadership race going on with the conservatives it's still not clear who will be elected the leader of the conservative party. The resignation of the interim prime minister as the leader of the conservative party last thursday at around 5pm ist has set this in motion. We will see how the parliament works first. It's the only nation in the world that doesn't have a written constitution. This literally means the parliament begins and ends with people and not on any written constitution. By default a government will fall when the people lose trust in their leader i.e. the prime minister of the country who is a natural leader of the party that runs the goverment. The race for the leader of the ruling party was set in motion when the prime minister resigned as the leader because of pressure from mps in his party. His leadership fell and there is now the race first to elect their leader. Once their party leader is elected then they will head the government. The resignation of the prime minister hasn't come yet from his office of the prime minister because the uncertainty of who will be their next leader. The present prime minister will continue until the next leader of the party is elected within their party from among the contestants in the party for the post of the leader of the party. As there is a competition and no clear consensus within it needs to be seen who will become the next leader and the prime minister.
Transcript: The recent debate featuring Kamala Harris and Donald Trump was an important moment for the Democratic nominee to solidify her position as a leader. Yet, instead of seizing the opportunity to project confidence and vision, Kamala seemed to falter, weighed down by personal fears and memories of long-standing struggles. A key point that stood out was how Kamala Harris seemed to forget the very words she once made her mantra in her career as a prosecutor: "Kamala Harris for the people." These five words, often repeated by her during her time in courtrooms, represented her fight for justice and equality. However, during the debate, this sense of purpose seemed absent. The stage was set for her to remind everyone why she was the candidate for all people, but she failed to deliver a message that would resonate on that larger stage. Rather than focusing on a forward-thinking vision, Harris spent much of her time reflecting on the negatives, particularly issues of racism, ...
Comments
Post a Comment