Skip to main content

Russia

His mouth is where the money is, this being the main propaganda of this waste economy. It started as an exercise outside of Ukraine. NATO and the G7 countries must have acted fast. They should have sealed off all borders before a Russian circus could land a place well before they could organize. This required political will not just men and artillery. There was enough time for all this and it could have happened well before 2014 annexation of crimea. The west has been a silent spectator waiting for the umbrella to open. Eight years of silence has cost 750 billion dollars to rebuild Ukraine. Will the west and it's allies close all the borders where russia will turn next? In the meantime, nowhere there has been a crisis of political nature. Political circles were going on and doing well just as Jen Psaki kept repeating the slogan 'circle back.' This went on repeating until long enough people will forget it and stop talking about. It's easy to pinpoint what russia intends to do next. It isn't hard enough to bring them to the negotiating table than it really appears. We are seeing the mirage and after we get close we find there isn't water for miles and miles in the desert. Russia's next target can be a person or place. The circus has shifted many places over the past one year. My second guess will be his own fm Lavrov in the end. Mr. Lavrov has given Putin a blank cheque for him to encash at anytime. Putin has destroyed his enemies one by one. We cannot change the circumstances, but it well within ourselves to change the situations leading to these circumstances. For now I will leave it right here. We still have plenty of time left for negotiations to carry on. No one person has all the answers. Not blinken, the west or any alliances. We are sure they have met with least success to stop putin and his brigade from advancing.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Rust Shooting Incident: Misconceptions and Facts

The wrongful confinement of Alec Baldwin for three years in relation to the "Rust" shooting incident starkly illustrates the issues plaguing the U.S. judicial system today. Baldwin's case, which stemmed from an on-set accident resulting in the tragic death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, highlighted significant flaws in the legal process. Firstly, the prolonged detention of Baldwin, despite the absence of substantial evidence proving criminal intent, underscores the tendency of the judicial system to prioritize punitive measures over a fair assessment of individual circumstances. Baldwin's role as an actor and producer should have been carefully scrutinized to distinguish between negligence and criminal liability. However, his extended confinement suggests a rush to judgment and a failure to uphold the presumption of innocence. Secondly, this case reveals systemic inefficiencies and bureaucratic delays within the court system. A three-year detention period before ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mortimer: The story of Walt Disney’s Mortimer’s flop and success

In the early 1960s, Walt Disney was at the peak of his success. His animation studio had produced some of the most beloved and iconic characters in history, including Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, and Goofy. But as the years went by, Disney began to feel that his studio had grown stagnant. He wanted to create something new, something that would challenge his animators and captivate audiences in a way that his previous works had not. That's when Disney stumbled upon a character that would change the course of his studio's history. His name was Mortimer, and he was a mischievous little boy with a shock of curly brown hair and a devilish grin. Disney was immediately taken with Mortimer's potential, and he knew that he had found something special. But there was a problem. Mortimer was not the kind of character that Disney's audience was used to seeing. He was too wild, too unpredictable. Disney's wife, Lillian, was particularly opposed to Mortimer, and she urged her hu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ukraine’s Soldiers at the Front: Battling in the Deadliest Conflict Zones

As the war in Ukraine continues to rage, certain front lines have become synonymous with extreme danger and unrelenting violence. The soldiers on these battlefields face some of the fiercest fighting in the entire war, making their stations among the most dangerous places to be in Ukraine’s ongoing defense against Russian forces. One of these deadly front lines lies in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, part of the broader Donbas, a war-torn zone that has been at the epicenter of conflict since 2014. This area remains a strategic focus for both sides, as Russian-backed separatists seek to solidify their territorial claims, and Ukrainian forces fight for control over key cities and towns that would provide them with a vital military and logistical advantage. The Hellscape of Bakhmut: A Case Study Perhaps no city better exemplifies the sheer brutality of the war than Bakhmut, a town that has seen constant battle for months. Once home to a vibrant community, Bakhmut now lies in ruins. The o...
Post a Comment
Read more