His mouth is where the money is, this being the main propaganda of this waste economy. It started as an exercise outside of Ukraine. NATO and the G7 countries must have acted fast. They should have sealed off all borders before a Russian circus could land a place well before they could organize. This required political will not just men and artillery. There was enough time for all this and it could have happened well before 2014 annexation of crimea. The west has been a silent spectator waiting for the umbrella to open. Eight years of silence has cost 750 billion dollars to rebuild Ukraine. Will the west and it's allies close all the borders where russia will turn next? In the meantime, nowhere there has been a crisis of political nature. Political circles were going on and doing well just as Jen Psaki kept repeating the slogan 'circle back.' This went on repeating until long enough people will forget it and stop talking about. It's easy to pinpoint what russia intends to do next. It isn't hard enough to bring them to the negotiating table than it really appears. We are seeing the mirage and after we get close we find there isn't water for miles and miles in the desert. Russia's next target can be a person or place. The circus has shifted many places over the past one year. My second guess will be his own fm Lavrov in the end. Mr. Lavrov has given Putin a blank cheque for him to encash at anytime. Putin has destroyed his enemies one by one. We cannot change the circumstances, but it well within ourselves to change the situations leading to these circumstances. For now I will leave it right here. We still have plenty of time left for negotiations to carry on. No one person has all the answers. Not blinken, the west or any alliances. We are sure they have met with least success to stop putin and his brigade from advancing.
Transcript: The recent debate featuring Kamala Harris and Donald Trump was an important moment for the Democratic nominee to solidify her position as a leader. Yet, instead of seizing the opportunity to project confidence and vision, Kamala seemed to falter, weighed down by personal fears and memories of long-standing struggles. A key point that stood out was how Kamala Harris seemed to forget the very words she once made her mantra in her career as a prosecutor: "Kamala Harris for the people." These five words, often repeated by her during her time in courtrooms, represented her fight for justice and equality. However, during the debate, this sense of purpose seemed absent. The stage was set for her to remind everyone why she was the candidate for all people, but she failed to deliver a message that would resonate on that larger stage. Rather than focusing on a forward-thinking vision, Harris spent much of her time reflecting on the negatives, particularly issues of racism, ...
Comments
Post a Comment