Skip to main content

Biden/Trump: Then and now there is no difference at all


The upcoming presidential election in the United States has generated a significant amount of discussion and debate, with the two major candidates, President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden, at the forefront of the conversation. While both candidates have addressed a wide range of issues during their campaigns, there is one pressing problem that neither has adequately addressed: income inequality.

Income inequality has been a growing concern in the United States for several decades. According to a report by the National Bureau of Economic Research, the top 1% of earners in the U.S. Captured over 40% of total income growth between 1979 and 2016. This trend has led to a significant wealth gap between the rich and poor, with many families struggling to make ends meet.

President Trump's approach to income inequality has been largely focused on tax reform and deregulation. In his first term, Trump signed into law a significant tax overhaul that reduced corporate taxes and eliminated some individual taxes. While this move was intended to stimulate economic growth and create jobs, it also disproportionately benefited wealthy individuals and corporations. According to an analysis by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, the top 1% of earners received an average tax cut of $51,000 in 2018, while the bottom 60% received an average cut of $600.

Trump has also taken steps to roll back certain regulatory measures that were designed to protect low-income families. For example, his administration has proposed cutting funding for programs like SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) and Medicaid, which provide critical support to millions of Americans living in poverty. While Trump has argued that these cuts are necessary to reduce government spending and promote self-sufficiency, critics have argued that they will disproportionately harm low-income families who rely on these programs to make ends meet.

Former Vice President Joe Biden's approach to income inequality has been more focused on social programs and investment in education and job training. During his campaign, Biden has proposed a number of initiatives aimed at reducing wealth disparities, including expanding access to affordable childcare, increasing the minimum wage, and investing in infrastructure projects that will create new jobs. Biden has also proposed a number of measures aimed at addressing systemic issues like housing affordability and access to healthcare for low-income families.

However, some critics have argued that Biden's proposals are not ambitious enough to address the root causes of income inequality. For example, while Biden has proposed expanding access to affordable childcare, his plan does not address the underlying issue of high childcare costs, which disproportionately burden low-income families. Similarly, while Biden has proposed increasing the minimum wage, his plan stops short of calling for a living wage that would truly lift families out of poverty.

In addition to these policy proposals, both candidates have faced criticism for their own personal wealth and connections to wealthy donors. President Trump is one of the wealthiest individuals ever elected to office, with an estimated net worth of over $2 billion. Biden, while not as wealthy as Trump, has also benefited from his long career in politics and has received significant financial support from wealthy donors throughout his campaign. This raises questions about whether either candidate is truly committed to addressing income inequality or whether they are simply paying lip service to the issue in order to appeal to voters.

In conclusion, while both President Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden have addressed income inequality during their campaigns, neither candidate has presented a comprehensive or ambitious plan for addressing this pressing problem. Both candidates have taken steps that will benefit wealthy individuals and corporations at the expense of low-income families, and both candidates have faced criticism for their own personal wealth and connections to wealthy donors. As voters head to the polls in November, it is clear that income inequality will continue to be a major issue in American politics, and it will be up to future leaders to develop truly transformative solutions that will promote economic justice and reduce wealth disparities.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump: ‘Letters to Trump’

Well what has the title do to write a post on this topic? This is not a book review, but in case you’re interested you can buy it from book stores everywhere, Amazon.com , Hannity.com . The post is only to highlight how Trump is in the moment desperate to win in the 2024 elections. A reason why he has come with a book not about elections, his achievements, business and not even his first fours 2016-2020 as the United States President. But, for those or anyone interested in reading this book it’s available in the links given above so you can buy it there. The title of the book is the title and the topic of this post. Good luck! Get your copy first before it’s all sold out.

The Endless Cycle of Misinformation and Deflection: Biden, Harris, and the 2024 Campaign

For four long years, a column was being written in the press, a persistent narrative that followed President Joe Biden through his term in office. Every time Biden faced tough questions or criticism, he would pause, take a deep breath, and yell back, branding the conversation as either "misinformation" or "disinformation." It became almost a hallmark of his response—deflecting any criticism by labeling it as part of some broader, nefarious campaign to distort the truth.  This strategy came full circle the day Biden signed his name to a critical decision: his reelection announcement for 2024. By deciding to run again, Biden’s reelection bid felt like the culmination of a column that had been continuously drafted, edited, and critiqued. His familiar refrain against “misinformation” became, in essence, the core message of his defense—any challenge to his policies or leadership was dismissed as an attack not based on facts but on falsehoods. But the story didn’t end the...

Learning English from the News: The Budameru Hyderabad Floods on August 31st

Learning English from the News: The Budameru Hyderabad Floods on August 31st Description: The recent floods in Budameru, Hyderabad, which occurred on August 31st, have drawn significant media attention, not only for their impact on the local community but also as a rich source of learning opportunities for English language learners. This article explores how engaging with news stories like the Budameru floods can enhance vocabulary, comprehension, and cultural awareness while providing a deeper understanding of current events. Introduction: On August 31st, 2024, Hyderabad faced unprecedented flooding in the Budameru area, a crisis that has left many residents grappling with the aftermath. Such news events are not only pivotal for understanding local and national issues but also serve as excellent resources for English language learners (ELLs) seeking to improve their skills. Understanding the Context Geographical Significance : Hyderabad : A major city in southern India, kno...