Skip to main content

Vivek Ramaswamy Hints at a "Rat Race" Inside the Democratic Party


Vivek Ramaswamy, a prominent figure in American politics and business, recently offered sharp criticism of the Democratic Party, describing the internal dynamics as a "rat race." During a public appearance, Ramaswamy, known for his bold and often controversial statements, implied that the party's leadership and potential candidates are more focused on internal power struggles than on the needs of the American people.

Ramaswamy's remarks come at a time when the Democratic Party is facing significant challenges. With the 2024 presidential election on the horizon, speculation around potential candidates and the future direction of the party is intensifying. Ramaswamy suggested that this internal competition is detracting from the party's ability to present a unified and compelling vision for the country.

The term "rat race" typically implies a frantic and competitive scramble for power, often at the expense of broader goals or ethical considerations. By using this phrase, Ramaswamy underscored what he perceives as the Democratic Party's prioritization of individual ambition over collective progress. His comments reflect a broader criticism often leveled at both major political parties in the U.S., where internal discord can sometimes overshadow the pursuit of coherent and effective governance.

As Ramaswamy continues to shape the political discourse, his remarks are likely to resonate with those who share his skepticism of the current political landscape, further fueling debate as the 2024 election draws nearer.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump: ‘Letters to Trump’

Well what has the title do to write a post on this topic? This is not a book review, but in case you’re interested you can buy it from book stores everywhere, Amazon.com , Hannity.com . The post is only to highlight how Trump is in the moment desperate to win in the 2024 elections. A reason why he has come with a book not about elections, his achievements, business and not even his first fours 2016-2020 as the United States President. But, for those or anyone interested in reading this book it’s available in the links given above so you can buy it there. The title of the book is the title and the topic of this post. Good luck! Get your copy first before it’s all sold out.

The Endless Cycle of Misinformation and Deflection: Biden, Harris, and the 2024 Campaign

For four long years, a column was being written in the press, a persistent narrative that followed President Joe Biden through his term in office. Every time Biden faced tough questions or criticism, he would pause, take a deep breath, and yell back, branding the conversation as either "misinformation" or "disinformation." It became almost a hallmark of his response—deflecting any criticism by labeling it as part of some broader, nefarious campaign to distort the truth.  This strategy came full circle the day Biden signed his name to a critical decision: his reelection announcement for 2024. By deciding to run again, Biden’s reelection bid felt like the culmination of a column that had been continuously drafted, edited, and critiqued. His familiar refrain against “misinformation” became, in essence, the core message of his defense—any challenge to his policies or leadership was dismissed as an attack not based on facts but on falsehoods. But the story didn’t end the...

The Taliban

This isn't the time to talk of any investments. First and foremost you have to show leadership to attract any investments. Not just saying we welcome anybody. This isn't foreign policy. That means subtly saying in the future we will allow anyone to use our country as a base to carry out any terrorist activity. This will create instability in the region from drugs, weapons and equipment. Can you introduce us to the team probing into the killing of Ayman al-Zawahiri? It's almost one year completed you still act like a group. Can you call for a referendum because you say that the people must want education for girls and women. Can you bring your people to vote whether they want education for girls and women? Just saying that people must decide on women and girls education, who are these people? Are they people in your group or the afghan population? You are open to have any agreement with anyone, but for this region we need openness for anyone in this region to tru...