Skip to main content

Kamala Harris: Missing the Moment to Define Her Leadership


Transcript:

The recent debate featuring Kamala Harris and Donald Trump was an important moment for the Democratic nominee to solidify her position as a leader. Yet, instead of seizing the opportunity to project confidence and vision, Kamala seemed to falter, weighed down by personal fears and memories of long-standing struggles.

A key point that stood out was how Kamala Harris seemed to forget the very words she once made her mantra in her career as a prosecutor: "Kamala Harris for the people." These five words, often repeated by her during her time in courtrooms, represented her fight for justice and equality. However, during the debate, this sense of purpose seemed absent. The stage was set for her to remind everyone why she was the candidate for all people, but she failed to deliver a message that would resonate on that larger stage.

Rather than focusing on a forward-thinking vision, Harris spent much of her time reflecting on the negatives, particularly issues of racism, sexism, and gender bias. While these are undeniably crucial topics, her emphasis on them came across as more defensive than inspiring. She allowed these themes to overshadow the positive aspects of her journey — her achievements, her strength, and her potential to lead with grace and authority. 

One strange moment that left many scratching their heads was when she brought up President Obama's birth certificate. In the context of the debate, no one had mentioned it, yet she felt compelled to discuss it. It was a callback to a controversy that many Americans had moved beyond, and it seemed to distract from the larger issues at hand. This move, alongside other missteps, made it appear as though Kamala was more focused on defending herself against ghosts of the past than in leading the country toward the future.

This was a disappointing moment for Kamala, especially as her first interview after becoming the Democratic nominee had left a stronger impression. Back then, she seemed poised and ready to take on the role of Commander-in-Chief. In that interview, many wondered if she had the mettle to write and enact executive orders with the decisiveness the position requires. But in this debate, her potential as a strong leader was called into question.

It brings to mind a quote from Jim Rohn: “There are some things you don't have to know how it works – only that it works. While some people are studying the roots, others are picking the fruit.” Kamala Harris, in this debate, was overly concerned with studying the roots—her past struggles, personal fears, and societal issues. Yet, what the American people needed was someone who was ready to pick the fruit — to take decisive action, to lead with confidence, and to focus on the future.

Kamala Harris missed an opportunity to define her leadership and make her presence felt. Instead, the debate became a platform for her to revisit old wounds, at the expense of addressing the pressing issues of the nation. In this crucial moment, she needed to remind everyone why she was "for the people." Instead, she became a reminder of what happens when a leader's fears overshadow their vision. The question now is whether she can turn things around and show the nation what kind of president she can truly be, or if this will mark the beginning of a difficult journey towards the end of her political career.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump: ‘Letters to Trump’

Well what has the title do to write a post on this topic? This is not a book review, but in case you’re interested you can buy it from book stores everywhere, Amazon.com , Hannity.com . The post is only to highlight how Trump is in the moment desperate to win in the 2024 elections. A reason why he has come with a book not about elections, his achievements, business and not even his first fours 2016-2020 as the United States President. But, for those or anyone interested in reading this book it’s available in the links given above so you can buy it there. The title of the book is the title and the topic of this post. Good luck! Get your copy first before it’s all sold out.

The Lebanon-Israel Conflict: Civilian Casualties Mount Amid Escalating Strikes and Regional Tensions

The war in Lebanon has taken a toll of over 500 civilians killed and nearly 16,000 hospitalized from Israel strikes in Southern Lebanon. Israel aims to create a buffer zone bordering between Northern Israel and Southern Lebanon pushing back the Hezbollah from that region. In a similar escalation of fight in 2006 inside Lebanon ended up without a victory for Israel at that time at which time nearly 1200 civilians were killed and a lot more pushed away for places safer in Northern Lebanon. The US has said that it would bring a ceasefire within a week to end the conflict which started in Gaza on October 7th between Israel and Hamas.