Skip to main content

Know your climate

Climate emergency is a localised issue up to 90% of cases. Examples as in the cases of fires in an area is not caused 90% of the time because of global warming. Fires within a 30 km radius is a failure among the people or the authorities in that area. Global warming does not cause accidental fires. It is a slow process in comparison to a chemical reaction like an organic reaction in a laboratory. Hence we can broadly classify effects of global warming on one to fires and the other of melting of glaciers and icebergs causing frequent floods etc. Before coming to a conclusion in cases of wild fires we should also consider the radius of spreading of the fire. It's important to take care of the habitat the flora and the fauna in the surroundings without causing much damage to the flora and the fauna. It's extremely important because some of the damages can be irreversible. It's also important to check with the local authorities and the people who have been staying in that area for any clue for preventing such accidents in the future. It's important not mis-term fires with emergencies. Local authorities should first go into the past records and check for clues with the local people to arrive at any solution. Climate emergencies must be studied especially to the melting of glaciers, rocks and soils in an environment that can bring about global warming or green house gas effects. Global warming causes are very gradual and can take months or years to show the results in cases of green house gas effects.
Note: Figures shown above is for illustration only.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump: ‘Letters to Trump’

Well what has the title do to write a post on this topic? This is not a book review, but in case you’re interested you can buy it from book stores everywhere, Amazon.com , Hannity.com . The post is only to highlight how Trump is in the moment desperate to win in the 2024 elections. A reason why he has come with a book not about elections, his achievements, business and not even his first fours 2016-2020 as the United States President. But, for those or anyone interested in reading this book it’s available in the links given above so you can buy it there. The title of the book is the title and the topic of this post. Good luck! Get your copy first before it’s all sold out.

The Taliban

This isn't the time to talk of any investments. First and foremost you have to show leadership to attract any investments. Not just saying we welcome anybody. This isn't foreign policy. That means subtly saying in the future we will allow anyone to use our country as a base to carry out any terrorist activity. This will create instability in the region from drugs, weapons and equipment. Can you introduce us to the team probing into the killing of Ayman al-Zawahiri? It's almost one year completed you still act like a group. Can you call for a referendum because you say that the people must want education for girls and women. Can you bring your people to vote whether they want education for girls and women? Just saying that people must decide on women and girls education, who are these people? Are they people in your group or the afghan population? You are open to have any agreement with anyone, but for this region we need openness for anyone in this region to tru...

The Endless Cycle of Misinformation and Deflection: Biden, Harris, and the 2024 Campaign

For four long years, a column was being written in the press, a persistent narrative that followed President Joe Biden through his term in office. Every time Biden faced tough questions or criticism, he would pause, take a deep breath, and yell back, branding the conversation as either "misinformation" or "disinformation." It became almost a hallmark of his response—deflecting any criticism by labeling it as part of some broader, nefarious campaign to distort the truth.  This strategy came full circle the day Biden signed his name to a critical decision: his reelection announcement for 2024. By deciding to run again, Biden’s reelection bid felt like the culmination of a column that had been continuously drafted, edited, and critiqued. His familiar refrain against “misinformation” became, in essence, the core message of his defense—any challenge to his policies or leadership was dismissed as an attack not based on facts but on falsehoods. But the story didn’t end the...