June every year is recognised as a month for the Pride group of people. The members of this group belong to the same sex male and female couples. There are different groups under the Pride group. Overall they all come under the Pride group of gay and lesbian couples and the just concluded month is given to them in recognition of this group of people. Universally sex between male and female is considered to be normal and also marriages are recognised only between a man an a woman. This is the accepted and recognised norm. Can we look at people under this group same as people with physical and mental disabilities? I think the sports community has started seeing them already. There are protests over the women belonging to this group to take part in international events for women. There are reasons given for that. Gay women belonging to this group prove to do better than the normal women in sports. Tests have attributed the reason for this being higher testosterone levels in the women belonging to this community or group. This has proved to make it difficult for them to compete in the same side with women. But, human rights activists have called for to treat them with equal dignity and respect as women and men. The group has grown since they came openly to speak. The question is whether we will have more answers before they will get full acceptance marriages, homes and privileges like everyone?
Transcript: The recent debate featuring Kamala Harris and Donald Trump was an important moment for the Democratic nominee to solidify her position as a leader. Yet, instead of seizing the opportunity to project confidence and vision, Kamala seemed to falter, weighed down by personal fears and memories of long-standing struggles. A key point that stood out was how Kamala Harris seemed to forget the very words she once made her mantra in her career as a prosecutor: "Kamala Harris for the people." These five words, often repeated by her during her time in courtrooms, represented her fight for justice and equality. However, during the debate, this sense of purpose seemed absent. The stage was set for her to remind everyone why she was the candidate for all people, but she failed to deliver a message that would resonate on that larger stage. Rather than focusing on a forward-thinking vision, Harris spent much of her time reflecting on the negatives, particularly issues of racism, ...
Comments
Post a Comment