Skip to main content

AG Garland defends search

Attorney General Garland says DOJ is moving to unseal search warrant from FBI raid of former Pres. Trump’s estate “in light of the president’s public confirmation of the search, the surrounding circumstances and the substantial public interest."

In a public statement the AG Garland defends himself for issuing FBI a search warrant to search the former President's Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida. The statement is more demoralising than motivating, to uphold the rule of law in an unprecedented search warrant issued to search the residence of a former president. From his point of view as an attorney his decision is right. But, from a general view point this is extremely demoralising. The AG should have seen his decision from different points of view not just from a justice point. This involves a former President and therefore he must have seen his decision more than one point of view. From a general perspective it looks like sending a trained myna to pick up dollars from outside and return. This is an extremely pitiable and mean decision not from an attorney's point of view, but from an ordinary American citizen point of view. He should have therefore seen well ahead the consequences of one decision going into history as a mean, weak and pitiable decision.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Trump: ‘Letters to Trump’

Well what has the title do to write a post on this topic? This is not a book review, but in case you’re interested you can buy it from book stores everywhere, Amazon.com , Hannity.com . The post is only to highlight how Trump is in the moment desperate to win in the 2024 elections. A reason why he has come with a book not about elections, his achievements, business and not even his first fours 2016-2020 as the United States President. But, for those or anyone interested in reading this book it’s available in the links given above so you can buy it there. The title of the book is the title and the topic of this post. Good luck! Get your copy first before it’s all sold out.
Post a Comment
Read more

The Taliban

This isn't the time to talk of any investments. First and foremost you have to show leadership to attract any investments. Not just saying we welcome anybody. This isn't foreign policy. That means subtly saying in the future we will allow anyone to use our country as a base to carry out any terrorist activity. This will create instability in the region from drugs, weapons and equipment. Can you introduce us to the team probing into the killing of Ayman al-Zawahiri? It's almost one year completed you still act like a group. Can you call for a referendum because you say that the people must want education for girls and women. Can you bring your people to vote whether they want education for girls and women? Just saying that people must decide on women and girls education, who are these people? Are they people in your group or the afghan population? You are open to have any agreement with anyone, but for this region we need openness for anyone in this region to tru...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Endless Cycle of Misinformation and Deflection: Biden, Harris, and the 2024 Campaign

For four long years, a column was being written in the press, a persistent narrative that followed President Joe Biden through his term in office. Every time Biden faced tough questions or criticism, he would pause, take a deep breath, and yell back, branding the conversation as either "misinformation" or "disinformation." It became almost a hallmark of his response—deflecting any criticism by labeling it as part of some broader, nefarious campaign to distort the truth.  This strategy came full circle the day Biden signed his name to a critical decision: his reelection announcement for 2024. By deciding to run again, Biden’s reelection bid felt like the culmination of a column that had been continuously drafted, edited, and critiqued. His familiar refrain against “misinformation” became, in essence, the core message of his defense—any challenge to his policies or leadership was dismissed as an attack not based on facts but on falsehoods. But the story didn’t end the...
Post a Comment
Read more