Biden's gaffes are to mislead others?

It doesn't seem to inappropriate at all and everything seems alright. In the latest one it's the handshake with Chuck Schumer. It's likely that Biden as the President of the United States his only job is to act out his gaffes. In public we know what he is doing. In behind the White House is being run by an inner circle of politicians from the democrat party and the executives in the administration.

The latest second handshake Chuck Schumer refuses to shake hands with Biden. This is for the first time the handshake with Chuck Schumer and Chuck Schumer immediately realises from his body language he becomes aware of the open drama. Without missing a heartbeat Schumer goes on with his next job to address over the system. This seems the gaffes likely are in place to avoid making mistakes over hot mikes. This appears to be a drama putting behind all speculations and doubts as to who really is the president. In this Chuck Schumer the case was about addressing the $700 billion dollar bill passed by the senate. This appears as a democrat ploy?

This revelation seems to be true because no one seems to take notice of it leading to speculation and doubts about the gaffes. No one has questioned the appropriateness of these gaffes or has come forward to challenge it in front of the judiciary. Is it a fundamental right guaranteed under a constitution to a president to act out these gaffes straight for another two years when the president's term comes to an end?

What about other Biden's gaffes? From the start it was all during when colleagues, friends and in friendly places with the exceptions of [...] during his election campaign and the second one in his six-nation tour of the middle east.

Comments

Mortimer: The story of Walt Disney’s Mortimer’s flop and success

In the early 1960s, Walt Disney was at the peak of his success. His animation studio had produced some of the most beloved and iconic characters in history, including Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, and Goofy. But as the years went by, Disney began to feel that his studio had grown stagnant. He wanted to create something new, something that would challenge his animators and captivate audiences in a way that his previous works had not. That's when Disney stumbled upon a character that would change the course of his studio's history. His name was Mortimer, and he was a mischievous little boy with a shock of curly brown hair and a devilish grin. Disney was immediately taken with Mortimer's potential, and he knew that he had found something special. But there was a problem. Mortimer was not the kind of character that Disney's audience was used to seeing. He was too wild, too unpredictable. Disney's wife, Lillian, was particularly opposed to Mortimer, and she urged her hu...

The Rust Shooting Incident: Misconceptions and Facts

The wrongful confinement of Alec Baldwin for three years in relation to the "Rust" shooting incident starkly illustrates the issues plaguing the U.S. judicial system today. Baldwin's case, which stemmed from an on-set accident resulting in the tragic death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, highlighted significant flaws in the legal process. Firstly, the prolonged detention of Baldwin, despite the absence of substantial evidence proving criminal intent, underscores the tendency of the judicial system to prioritize punitive measures over a fair assessment of individual circumstances. Baldwin's role as an actor and producer should have been carefully scrutinized to distinguish between negligence and criminal liability. However, his extended confinement suggests a rush to judgment and a failure to uphold the presumption of innocence. Secondly, this case reveals systemic inefficiencies and bureaucratic delays within the court system. A three-year detention period before ...

Prodigal sons: Einstein and Epstein

While it may be true that the names Jeffrey Epstein and Albert Einstein share some similarities in terms of their length and pronunciation, it would be a grave mistake to ever confuse the two individuals. The differences between these two men are vast, and their contributions to society could not be more disparate. Firstly, Albert Einstein was a world-renowned physicist who made groundbreaking discoveries in the field of science. He is widely regarded as one of the most influential scientists of the 20th century, and his theories on relativity and quantum mechanics have had a profound impact on our understanding of the universe. In contrast, Jeffrey Epstein was a wealthy financier who was accused of, and ultimately convicted for, multiple counts of sexual abuse and trafficking of minors. His actions were abhorrent and have left a lasting stain on society. Secondly, Einstein's legacy is one of intellectual curiosity, innovation, and humanitarianism. He was a passionate advocate for ...

Francis Hector's Official Website

Search This Blog