Skip to main content

Department of Justice


The trouble started for Trump is 2019. At that time trouble started pouring in. In actuality the COVID was a strategy against Trump’s re-election in 2020. The Russian conspiracy in 2016 was just in theory linking Trump to de-rail his opponent Hillary Clinton in the Presidential election of 2016. In actuality it was nothing more than just fake news or misinformation or disinformation just as Biden put it in relation to zero inflation. The democrats had been following this strategy of misinformation, disinformation or fake news since Hillary Clinton's defeat in the 2016 elections. The purpose was to distract Trump from executing his work as President with the next Presidential elections in 2020 to throw him out of office. The democrats were not in mind to work for the people of America who had elected them to their posts. The next four years the democrats did nothing except to dismantle Trump in 2020 which they succeeded. Trump had been controversial in the eyes of the public since 2016 one leading to the next until 2019 when COVID broke out. Trump didn't move until March 2019 when already COVID had started taking it's toll. Everything until one year after that whatever the democrats were doing was just a plan they were executing which had been pre-planned. Everything from the election of Biden as the President from COVID, Impeachment, Jan 6th Capitol riots and the most recent DOJ serving a search warrant against Trump had been pre-planned. From the election of Biden in 2020 till the most recent involving the DOJ is democrats Plan B for 2024. Everything else that had happened in the State like BLM, cases against Jan 6 rioters, floods, wild fires are repercussions starting with Joe Biden. We will see the results of all this when new Senate is elected.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Rust Shooting Incident: Misconceptions and Facts

The wrongful confinement of Alec Baldwin for three years in relation to the "Rust" shooting incident starkly illustrates the issues plaguing the U.S. judicial system today. Baldwin's case, which stemmed from an on-set accident resulting in the tragic death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, highlighted significant flaws in the legal process. Firstly, the prolonged detention of Baldwin, despite the absence of substantial evidence proving criminal intent, underscores the tendency of the judicial system to prioritize punitive measures over a fair assessment of individual circumstances. Baldwin's role as an actor and producer should have been carefully scrutinized to distinguish between negligence and criminal liability. However, his extended confinement suggests a rush to judgment and a failure to uphold the presumption of innocence. Secondly, this case reveals systemic inefficiencies and bureaucratic delays within the court system. A three-year detention period before ...

Mortimer: The story of Walt Disney’s Mortimer’s flop and success

In the early 1960s, Walt Disney was at the peak of his success. His animation studio had produced some of the most beloved and iconic characters in history, including Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, and Goofy. But as the years went by, Disney began to feel that his studio had grown stagnant. He wanted to create something new, something that would challenge his animators and captivate audiences in a way that his previous works had not. That's when Disney stumbled upon a character that would change the course of his studio's history. His name was Mortimer, and he was a mischievous little boy with a shock of curly brown hair and a devilish grin. Disney was immediately taken with Mortimer's potential, and he knew that he had found something special. But there was a problem. Mortimer was not the kind of character that Disney's audience was used to seeing. He was too wild, too unpredictable. Disney's wife, Lillian, was particularly opposed to Mortimer, and she urged her hu...

Ukraine’s Soldiers at the Front: Battling in the Deadliest Conflict Zones

As the war in Ukraine continues to rage, certain front lines have become synonymous with extreme danger and unrelenting violence. The soldiers on these battlefields face some of the fiercest fighting in the entire war, making their stations among the most dangerous places to be in Ukraine’s ongoing defense against Russian forces. One of these deadly front lines lies in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, part of the broader Donbas, a war-torn zone that has been at the epicenter of conflict since 2014. This area remains a strategic focus for both sides, as Russian-backed separatists seek to solidify their territorial claims, and Ukrainian forces fight for control over key cities and towns that would provide them with a vital military and logistical advantage. The Hellscape of Bakhmut: A Case Study Perhaps no city better exemplifies the sheer brutality of the war than Bakhmut, a town that has seen constant battle for months. Once home to a vibrant community, Bakhmut now lies in ruins. The o...