Skip to main content

Elon Musk Part 2


I'm glad I have told you about the $44 billion dollar deal that didn't go through. Actually I muted that without the name of the company. Today I'm happy to tell you the developments. The deal was an offer made by Musk to the silicon valley social media giant Twitter. It started out twitter's offer for musk to join the board. He was given a red carpet welcome. Musk came forward with another idea to takeover the social media company. To that he made a final offer of $44 billions which twitter without hesitating for a moment accepted. For days that was trending. The stock prices shot up. In the background musk wished to finalise the offer so he asked for some inputs. Twitter gave him the numbers, elon didn't accept it and according to him that varied a huge difference between his expectations and the numbers twitter had given. Elon backed away. This jolted the company in the stock market. On the other hand his Tesla organization stock prices began performing better after he backed out with differences in the numbers. Twitter was looking to bridge the gaps. Finally twitter approached the court for redressal. Now elon is challenging twitter for the correct numbers. He said the earlier offer what he made would be valid if he gets everything cleared meaning he wanted openness from the company on the part of the company. The case is coming up ahead of October trial. Today this is the much talked topic on the internet. We'll have to wait how in the coming days this will catch steam. Already with news getting hot the stock price of twitter has dramatically gone up.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump: ‘Letters to Trump’

Well what has the title do to write a post on this topic? This is not a book review, but in case you’re interested you can buy it from book stores everywhere, Amazon.com , Hannity.com . The post is only to highlight how Trump is in the moment desperate to win in the 2024 elections. A reason why he has come with a book not about elections, his achievements, business and not even his first fours 2016-2020 as the United States President. But, for those or anyone interested in reading this book it’s available in the links given above so you can buy it there. The title of the book is the title and the topic of this post. Good luck! Get your copy first before it’s all sold out.

The Taliban

This isn't the time to talk of any investments. First and foremost you have to show leadership to attract any investments. Not just saying we welcome anybody. This isn't foreign policy. That means subtly saying in the future we will allow anyone to use our country as a base to carry out any terrorist activity. This will create instability in the region from drugs, weapons and equipment. Can you introduce us to the team probing into the killing of Ayman al-Zawahiri? It's almost one year completed you still act like a group. Can you call for a referendum because you say that the people must want education for girls and women. Can you bring your people to vote whether they want education for girls and women? Just saying that people must decide on women and girls education, who are these people? Are they people in your group or the afghan population? You are open to have any agreement with anyone, but for this region we need openness for anyone in this region to tru...

The Endless Cycle of Misinformation and Deflection: Biden, Harris, and the 2024 Campaign

For four long years, a column was being written in the press, a persistent narrative that followed President Joe Biden through his term in office. Every time Biden faced tough questions or criticism, he would pause, take a deep breath, and yell back, branding the conversation as either "misinformation" or "disinformation." It became almost a hallmark of his response—deflecting any criticism by labeling it as part of some broader, nefarious campaign to distort the truth.  This strategy came full circle the day Biden signed his name to a critical decision: his reelection announcement for 2024. By deciding to run again, Biden’s reelection bid felt like the culmination of a column that had been continuously drafted, edited, and critiqued. His familiar refrain against “misinformation” became, in essence, the core message of his defense—any challenge to his policies or leadership was dismissed as an attack not based on facts but on falsehoods. But the story didn’t end the...