Skip to main content

Uvalde: Unanswered questions still not having an answer to parent’s questions


Last year in 2022 exactly 365 days past a school in the Texas state in the US came under a violent attack which involved a mass shooter randomly shooting kids in a classroom. It is believed the mass shooter who was neutralized and killed later was a former student from the same school.

There are many questions still unanswered to the parents of the lost children who haven’t got any reply so far. This shooting is of utmost importance because one year after it still worries other parents in other places whether the same thing would ever happen to their children too in the future?

Now given the nature of the time, place and the shooter there needs only one question that needs answer would answer all other questions surrounding the suspense around this one of a kind instance in the US which is always coming under such attacks similar and same from other places in the US frequently. Where does the problem really lie is it with the school, the authority or the parents to be more careful and cautious in the future?

The past can only give us a clue and the future only can answer this heavy burden question of the parents? I am optimistic about the state to take up the case seriously and give an answer to these numerous aspersions and doubts involving the police, crime and the authorities.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump: ‘Letters to Trump’

Well what has the title do to write a post on this topic? This is not a book review, but in case you’re interested you can buy it from book stores everywhere, Amazon.com , Hannity.com . The post is only to highlight how Trump is in the moment desperate to win in the 2024 elections. A reason why he has come with a book not about elections, his achievements, business and not even his first fours 2016-2020 as the United States President. But, for those or anyone interested in reading this book it’s available in the links given above so you can buy it there. The title of the book is the title and the topic of this post. Good luck! Get your copy first before it’s all sold out.

The Taliban

This isn't the time to talk of any investments. First and foremost you have to show leadership to attract any investments. Not just saying we welcome anybody. This isn't foreign policy. That means subtly saying in the future we will allow anyone to use our country as a base to carry out any terrorist activity. This will create instability in the region from drugs, weapons and equipment. Can you introduce us to the team probing into the killing of Ayman al-Zawahiri? It's almost one year completed you still act like a group. Can you call for a referendum because you say that the people must want education for girls and women. Can you bring your people to vote whether they want education for girls and women? Just saying that people must decide on women and girls education, who are these people? Are they people in your group or the afghan population? You are open to have any agreement with anyone, but for this region we need openness for anyone in this region to tru...

The Endless Cycle of Misinformation and Deflection: Biden, Harris, and the 2024 Campaign

For four long years, a column was being written in the press, a persistent narrative that followed President Joe Biden through his term in office. Every time Biden faced tough questions or criticism, he would pause, take a deep breath, and yell back, branding the conversation as either "misinformation" or "disinformation." It became almost a hallmark of his response—deflecting any criticism by labeling it as part of some broader, nefarious campaign to distort the truth.  This strategy came full circle the day Biden signed his name to a critical decision: his reelection announcement for 2024. By deciding to run again, Biden’s reelection bid felt like the culmination of a column that had been continuously drafted, edited, and critiqued. His familiar refrain against “misinformation” became, in essence, the core message of his defense—any challenge to his policies or leadership was dismissed as an attack not based on facts but on falsehoods. But the story didn’t end the...