Skip to main content

Israel-Gaza war: What is your legitimate conclusion?

The ongoing conflict between Hamas and Israel has been a long-standing issue in the Middle East. The question of who has given Hamas the authority to expand its territory from the river to the sea is a contentious one, with both sides claiming legitimacy for their actions.

Hamas, a militant Islamic organization, has been in control of the Gaza Strip since 2007. Its charter calls for the destruction of Israel and the establishment of an Islamic state in Palestine. Hamas has been accused of using violence and terrorism to achieve its goals, including numerous rocket attacks on Israeli cities.

Israel, on the other hand, is a democratic state that has existed since 1948. It has faced numerous security threats over the years, including from Hamas and other militant groups. Israel's position is that it has the right to defend itself against these threats and that it will not allow Hamas to expand its authority beyond the Gaza Strip.

The issue of who has given Hamas the authority to expand its territory from the river to the sea is a complex one. Some argue that Hamas's charter and actions demonstrate its desire to expand beyond the Gaza Strip, while others point to Israel's occupation of the West Bank as a justification for Hamas's actions.

Israel's occupation of the West Bank, which began in 1967, has been a major source of tension in the region. Many Palestinians view this as a violation of their rights and see it as evidence of Israel's intent to expand its territory at their expense. Hamas has used this as a rallying cry, arguing that it is fighting against Israeli aggression and occupation.

However, Israel maintains that it is not expanding its territory but rather defending itself against threats from militant groups like Hamas. It argues that it has withdrawn from Gaza and that it is willing to negotiate a peace agreement with Palestinians based on mutual recognition and security guarantees.

In conclusion, the question of who has given Hamas the authority to expand its territory from the river to the sea is one that is deeply contested. Both sides have legitimate grievances and claims, but ultimately it will be up to the parties involved to find a peaceful solution that respects both their rights and interests. Until then, the conflict between Hamas and Israel will continue to be a source of tension and instability in the region.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump: ‘Letters to Trump’

Well what has the title do to write a post on this topic? This is not a book review, but in case you’re interested you can buy it from book stores everywhere, Amazon.com , Hannity.com . The post is only to highlight how Trump is in the moment desperate to win in the 2024 elections. A reason why he has come with a book not about elections, his achievements, business and not even his first fours 2016-2020 as the United States President. But, for those or anyone interested in reading this book it’s available in the links given above so you can buy it there. The title of the book is the title and the topic of this post. Good luck! Get your copy first before it’s all sold out.

The Taliban

This isn't the time to talk of any investments. First and foremost you have to show leadership to attract any investments. Not just saying we welcome anybody. This isn't foreign policy. That means subtly saying in the future we will allow anyone to use our country as a base to carry out any terrorist activity. This will create instability in the region from drugs, weapons and equipment. Can you introduce us to the team probing into the killing of Ayman al-Zawahiri? It's almost one year completed you still act like a group. Can you call for a referendum because you say that the people must want education for girls and women. Can you bring your people to vote whether they want education for girls and women? Just saying that people must decide on women and girls education, who are these people? Are they people in your group or the afghan population? You are open to have any agreement with anyone, but for this region we need openness for anyone in this region to tru...

The Endless Cycle of Misinformation and Deflection: Biden, Harris, and the 2024 Campaign

For four long years, a column was being written in the press, a persistent narrative that followed President Joe Biden through his term in office. Every time Biden faced tough questions or criticism, he would pause, take a deep breath, and yell back, branding the conversation as either "misinformation" or "disinformation." It became almost a hallmark of his response—deflecting any criticism by labeling it as part of some broader, nefarious campaign to distort the truth.  This strategy came full circle the day Biden signed his name to a critical decision: his reelection announcement for 2024. By deciding to run again, Biden’s reelection bid felt like the culmination of a column that had been continuously drafted, edited, and critiqued. His familiar refrain against “misinformation” became, in essence, the core message of his defense—any challenge to his policies or leadership was dismissed as an attack not based on facts but on falsehoods. But the story didn’t end the...