Skip to main content

Court's Final Judgement: Is it within reason to admit a unanimous decision by all the judges?


In a legal context, a court decision is considered final when it receives the support of a majority of the judges involved in the case. While a unanimous decision is ideal, it is not always possible, especially in complex or contentious cases. In such situations, the court may issue a decision with a majority vote, with the dissenting judges' opinions included in the written judgment.

In some cases, a court may also issue a per curiam decision, which is a decision made by the court as a whole rather than by an individual judge. This type of decision is typically used in less significant cases where there is no dissenting opinion.

While 200 words may seem like a small number, it is sufficient to convey the essential facts and reasoning behind a court decision. In fact, many appellate court decisions are limited to 200 words or less due to space constraints in legal publications.

However, the quality and clarity of the writing are more important than the word count. A well-written decision should be clear, concise, and persuasive, with a logical and coherent argument supported by relevant legal precedent and facts.

Ultimately, while a unanimous decision is preferred, as long as the majority of judges agree on the outcome of the case and provide a sound legal rationale for their decision, it is considered valid and binding on the parties involved.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump: ‘Letters to Trump’

Well what has the title do to write a post on this topic? This is not a book review, but in case you’re interested you can buy it from book stores everywhere, Amazon.com , Hannity.com . The post is only to highlight how Trump is in the moment desperate to win in the 2024 elections. A reason why he has come with a book not about elections, his achievements, business and not even his first fours 2016-2020 as the United States President. But, for those or anyone interested in reading this book it’s available in the links given above so you can buy it there. The title of the book is the title and the topic of this post. Good luck! Get your copy first before it’s all sold out.

The Lebanon-Israel Conflict: Civilian Casualties Mount Amid Escalating Strikes and Regional Tensions

The war in Lebanon has taken a toll of over 500 civilians killed and nearly 16,000 hospitalized from Israel strikes in Southern Lebanon. Israel aims to create a buffer zone bordering between Northern Israel and Southern Lebanon pushing back the Hezbollah from that region. In a similar escalation of fight in 2006 inside Lebanon ended up without a victory for Israel at that time at which time nearly 1200 civilians were killed and a lot more pushed away for places safer in Northern Lebanon. The US has said that it would bring a ceasefire within a week to end the conflict which started in Gaza on October 7th between Israel and Hamas.  

Kamala Harris: Missing the Moment to Define Her Leadership

Transcript: The recent debate featuring Kamala Harris and Donald Trump was an important moment for the Democratic nominee to solidify her position as a leader. Yet, instead of seizing the opportunity to project confidence and vision, Kamala seemed to falter, weighed down by personal fears and memories of long-standing struggles. A key point that stood out was how Kamala Harris seemed to forget the very words she once made her mantra in her career as a prosecutor: "Kamala Harris for the people." These five words, often repeated by her during her time in courtrooms, represented her fight for justice and equality. However, during the debate, this sense of purpose seemed absent. The stage was set for her to remind everyone why she was the candidate for all people, but she failed to deliver a message that would resonate on that larger stage. Rather than focusing on a forward-thinking vision, Harris spent much of her time reflecting on the negatives, particularly issues of racism, ...