Court's Final Judgement: Is it within reason to admit a unanimous decision by all the judges?

In a legal context, a court decision is considered final when it receives the support of a majority of the judges involved in the case. While a unanimous decision is ideal, it is not always possible, especially in complex or contentious cases. In such situations, the court may issue a decision with a majority vote, with the dissenting judges' opinions included in the written judgment.

In some cases, a court may also issue a per curiam decision, which is a decision made by the court as a whole rather than by an individual judge. This type of decision is typically used in less significant cases where there is no dissenting opinion.

While 200 words may seem like a small number, it is sufficient to convey the essential facts and reasoning behind a court decision. In fact, many appellate court decisions are limited to 200 words or less due to space constraints in legal publications.

However, the quality and clarity of the writing are more important than the word count. A well-written decision should be clear, concise, and persuasive, with a logical and coherent argument supported by relevant legal precedent and facts.

Ultimately, while a unanimous decision is preferred, as long as the majority of judges agree on the outcome of the case and provide a sound legal rationale for their decision, it is considered valid and binding on the parties involved.