Skip to main content

Understanding the Infamy of Iran's Revolutionary Guards: A Comprehensive Overview


The Iranian Revolutionary Guards, also known as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), are a unique military and political institution in Iran. Established after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, they act as a parallel military force alongside the regular Iranian Armed Forces. Their infamy stems from several factors:

1. Political Role: The IRGC has significant influence in Iranian politics, often supporting conservative factions and playing a role in decision-making processes. This has led to concerns about the group's potential interference in the country's democratic processes.

2. External Operations: The IRGC is accused of sponsoring and conducting terrorist activities and proxy wars in the Middle East and beyond. They have been linked to various conflicts, including the Syrian Civil War and the Yemeni Crisis, as well as attacks on Israeli targets and the assassination of political opponents abroad.

3. Human Rights Violations: The IRGC has been criticized for its involvement in suppressing dissent and human rights abuses within Iran. They have been accused of engaging in torture, extrajudicial killings, and arbitrary arrests, particularly during the post-election protests in 2009.

4. Economic Activities: The IRGC controls a vast network of businesses and industries in Iran, known as the "economy of resistance." This has led to concerns about corruption, monopolies, and the misallocation of resources in the Iranian economy.

5. Designation as a Terrorist Organization: In 2019, the United States designated the IRGC as a foreign terrorist organization, making it the first branch of another government to receive such a designation. This move has further escalated tensions between Iran and the U.S. and increased the IRGC's global infamy.

In summary, the Iranian Revolutionary Guards' infamy stems from their significant political influence, involvement in regional conflicts and terrorism, human rights abuses, and economic activities. These factors have contributed to their reputation as a powerful, yet controversial, institution in Iran and the international community.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump: ‘Letters to Trump’

Well what has the title do to write a post on this topic? This is not a book review, but in case you’re interested you can buy it from book stores everywhere, Amazon.com , Hannity.com . The post is only to highlight how Trump is in the moment desperate to win in the 2024 elections. A reason why he has come with a book not about elections, his achievements, business and not even his first fours 2016-2020 as the United States President. But, for those or anyone interested in reading this book it’s available in the links given above so you can buy it there. The title of the book is the title and the topic of this post. Good luck! Get your copy first before it’s all sold out.

The Endless Cycle of Misinformation and Deflection: Biden, Harris, and the 2024 Campaign

For four long years, a column was being written in the press, a persistent narrative that followed President Joe Biden through his term in office. Every time Biden faced tough questions or criticism, he would pause, take a deep breath, and yell back, branding the conversation as either "misinformation" or "disinformation." It became almost a hallmark of his response—deflecting any criticism by labeling it as part of some broader, nefarious campaign to distort the truth.  This strategy came full circle the day Biden signed his name to a critical decision: his reelection announcement for 2024. By deciding to run again, Biden’s reelection bid felt like the culmination of a column that had been continuously drafted, edited, and critiqued. His familiar refrain against “misinformation” became, in essence, the core message of his defense—any challenge to his policies or leadership was dismissed as an attack not based on facts but on falsehoods. But the story didn’t end the...

The Taliban

This isn't the time to talk of any investments. First and foremost you have to show leadership to attract any investments. Not just saying we welcome anybody. This isn't foreign policy. That means subtly saying in the future we will allow anyone to use our country as a base to carry out any terrorist activity. This will create instability in the region from drugs, weapons and equipment. Can you introduce us to the team probing into the killing of Ayman al-Zawahiri? It's almost one year completed you still act like a group. Can you call for a referendum because you say that the people must want education for girls and women. Can you bring your people to vote whether they want education for girls and women? Just saying that people must decide on women and girls education, who are these people? Are they people in your group or the afghan population? You are open to have any agreement with anyone, but for this region we need openness for anyone in this region to tru...