Skip to main content

The Rate Cut Dilemma: A Panic Response or Strategic Move?


Unemployment was the main reason for the FED rate cut of 50bps. This cannot be seen in light of the increase in costs of household items from gas to groceries and the timing of the elections in mind. The American Dream which the Americans had always cherished to call themselves saw this rate cut not less than any panic by insiders inside the Democrat party itself. 

How will the Americans as a whole see this rate cut?
We have seen the unemployment rate slipping away, which has almost halved in this administration. The reason is that the administration has been concentrating on its political agenda more than anything else, at least the welfare of its own population. The administration has been extremely slow in reacting to any of its urgent calls despite the urgency of it in the Middle East peace and reconciliation process since October 7th.

Most of the urgent and demanding issues have been manipulated or stalled from foreign to domestic issues and the economy is one of them also. The administration could have resolved or been closer to resolving most of the issues the majority of Americans had been focusing on. Instead, the administration took to the path of vengeance and revenge on its Republican opponents and that is the reason for this panic.

The administration could have eased some of its financial strains but made it easy by throwing the blame on the previous Trump government and has since come up with more left policies with regards to administration and governing adding to the already burden of the economy on average to below average Americans.

From excise to CGT (capital gains tax), and increasing housing costs the administration has not been focusing on the increased burden on Gen Z and the citizens over 65 in the country. The rate cut has not changed anything, instead, it has put more money in the hands of the wealthy to filthy rich Americans in the country and also those living abroad. The rate cut has only changed hands from the bankers to individuals.




 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Prodigal sons: Einstein and Epstein

While it may be true that the names Jeffrey Epstein and Albert Einstein share some similarities in terms of their length and pronunciation, it would be a grave mistake to ever confuse the two individuals. The differences between these two men are vast, and their contributions to society could not be more disparate. Firstly, Albert Einstein was a world-renowned physicist who made groundbreaking discoveries in the field of science. He is widely regarded as one of the most influential scientists of the 20th century, and his theories on relativity and quantum mechanics have had a profound impact on our understanding of the universe. In contrast, Jeffrey Epstein was a wealthy financier who was accused of, and ultimately convicted for, multiple counts of sexual abuse and trafficking of minors. His actions were abhorrent and have left a lasting stain on society. Secondly, Einstein's legacy is one of intellectual curiosity, innovation, and humanitarianism. He was a passionate advocate for ...

The Rust Shooting Incident: Misconceptions and Facts

The wrongful confinement of Alec Baldwin for three years in relation to the "Rust" shooting incident starkly illustrates the issues plaguing the U.S. judicial system today. Baldwin's case, which stemmed from an on-set accident resulting in the tragic death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, highlighted significant flaws in the legal process. Firstly, the prolonged detention of Baldwin, despite the absence of substantial evidence proving criminal intent, underscores the tendency of the judicial system to prioritize punitive measures over a fair assessment of individual circumstances. Baldwin's role as an actor and producer should have been carefully scrutinized to distinguish between negligence and criminal liability. However, his extended confinement suggests a rush to judgment and a failure to uphold the presumption of innocence. Secondly, this case reveals systemic inefficiencies and bureaucratic delays within the court system. A three-year detention period before ...

Ukraine’s Soldiers at the Front: Battling in the Deadliest Conflict Zones

As the war in Ukraine continues to rage, certain front lines have become synonymous with extreme danger and unrelenting violence. The soldiers on these battlefields face some of the fiercest fighting in the entire war, making their stations among the most dangerous places to be in Ukraine’s ongoing defense against Russian forces. One of these deadly front lines lies in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, part of the broader Donbas, a war-torn zone that has been at the epicenter of conflict since 2014. This area remains a strategic focus for both sides, as Russian-backed separatists seek to solidify their territorial claims, and Ukrainian forces fight for control over key cities and towns that would provide them with a vital military and logistical advantage. The Hellscape of Bakhmut: A Case Study Perhaps no city better exemplifies the sheer brutality of the war than Bakhmut, a town that has seen constant battle for months. Once home to a vibrant community, Bakhmut now lies in ruins. The o...