Skip to main content

Dear President Biden,


Dear President Biden,

I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing to express my concerns regarding recent statements made by White House officials in response to ongoing crises. At a time when every moment counts and swift, empathetic action is essential, it seems counterproductive to focus on critics of your administration or discuss issues of misinformation or disinformation. While these topics certainly deserve attention, addressing them during a time of crisis feels misaligned with the urgency of the situation.

Over the past three days, the dialogue from White House officials has often seemed to revolve around who is scrutinizing your administration rather than focusing on who is standing in solidarity with it. In moments like these, the world watches not to critique, but to see who will rise to offer support and leadership. Shifting the focus to this would not only better reflect the gravity of the situation but also embody a more diplomatic and humane approach.

It is disheartening, and some might say even unparliamentary, to allow any moment of crisis to become about responding to critics rather than responding to those in need. For even a moment to divert attention from the misfortune people are enduring is, simply put, inhumane.

I urge you and your team to set aside these discussions for a more appropriate time and prioritize the compassion, resolve, and action that the world expects from the United States in times of crisis.

Sincerely,  
[Your Name]  


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump: ‘Letters to Trump’

Well what has the title do to write a post on this topic? This is not a book review, but in case you’re interested you can buy it from book stores everywhere, Amazon.com , Hannity.com . The post is only to highlight how Trump is in the moment desperate to win in the 2024 elections. A reason why he has come with a book not about elections, his achievements, business and not even his first fours 2016-2020 as the United States President. But, for those or anyone interested in reading this book it’s available in the links given above so you can buy it there. The title of the book is the title and the topic of this post. Good luck! Get your copy first before it’s all sold out.

The Taliban

This isn't the time to talk of any investments. First and foremost you have to show leadership to attract any investments. Not just saying we welcome anybody. This isn't foreign policy. That means subtly saying in the future we will allow anyone to use our country as a base to carry out any terrorist activity. This will create instability in the region from drugs, weapons and equipment. Can you introduce us to the team probing into the killing of Ayman al-Zawahiri? It's almost one year completed you still act like a group. Can you call for a referendum because you say that the people must want education for girls and women. Can you bring your people to vote whether they want education for girls and women? Just saying that people must decide on women and girls education, who are these people? Are they people in your group or the afghan population? You are open to have any agreement with anyone, but for this region we need openness for anyone in this region to tru...

The Endless Cycle of Misinformation and Deflection: Biden, Harris, and the 2024 Campaign

For four long years, a column was being written in the press, a persistent narrative that followed President Joe Biden through his term in office. Every time Biden faced tough questions or criticism, he would pause, take a deep breath, and yell back, branding the conversation as either "misinformation" or "disinformation." It became almost a hallmark of his response—deflecting any criticism by labeling it as part of some broader, nefarious campaign to distort the truth.  This strategy came full circle the day Biden signed his name to a critical decision: his reelection announcement for 2024. By deciding to run again, Biden’s reelection bid felt like the culmination of a column that had been continuously drafted, edited, and critiqued. His familiar refrain against “misinformation” became, in essence, the core message of his defense—any challenge to his policies or leadership was dismissed as an attack not based on facts but on falsehoods. But the story didn’t end the...